Corporate Board Member magazines

Corporate Board Member Magazine NYSE Euronext

Board Committee Interactive
Home / Magazine / Archives 06-07 / May/June 2007 / How Full-Board Evaluations Are Paying Off

How Full-Board Evaluations Are Paying Off



from May/June 2007
Just as many directors who’ve been through individual evaluations say the process has been helpful, they and the consultants who work with them have also seen tangible benefits come from evaluating boards as a whole. “If you measure performance, it tends to encourage better performance,” says Thomas Doorley, chairman and CEO of Sage Partners, a management consulting firm in Asheville, North Carolina, and lead director at Natrol Inc., a maker of dietary supplements.

Is there one big common lesson emerging from board evaluations? Yes, says David Nadler, chairman of Mercer Delta Organizational Consulting. He estimates that about three-quarters of the boards conclude that they’re spending too much time listening to presentations and not enough time discussing issues raised by those presentations. Recognizing this helps push them to change, he says.

Nadler adds that many boards also wind up rethinking the question of which issues merit their time and attention, “often leading to a radical restructuring of the agenda to take some topics out and add others in.” In many cases, he says, that translates to a sharper focus on corporate strategy. Other outcomes of whole-board evaluations:

Comment on issue